Hael
Sign inBook a demo
FRAMEWORK

Illinois HB 3773

Illinois' amendment to the Human Rights Act governing employer use of AI in employment decisions. In force since 1 January 2026. Strict liability for discriminatory effects across the full employment lifecycle, mandatory worker notice, and a prohibition on zip-code proxies.

Coverage updated2 min ago
Coverage · Illinois HB 3773
Framework coverage
88%
Coverage
IHRA amendment
Obligations mapped
+4% wk
4
Files on record
Live · synced 2 min ago · 7-day trend
Recent activity
Annex IV v4Approved
FRIA v2Approved
Monitoring plan v1Draft
THE OBLIGATION

No discriminatory-effect AI in employment — strict liability, with notice.

HB 3773 amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to prohibit employers from using AI that has the effect of subjecting employees or applicants to discrimination on the basis of protected classes — across the entire employment lifecycle: recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal, training selection, discharge, discipline, tenure, and terms and conditions. Liability is strict: a discriminatory effect is enough, and intent is not a defence.

Employers must give notice when AI is used in those decisions and may not use zip codes as proxies for protected classes. The Illinois Department of Human Rights enforces under the IHRA; IDHR's draft Subpart J implementing rules elaborate the notice form, recordkeeping and audit-trail expectations.

At a glance
Applies toEmployers using AI in decisions affecting Illinois workers or applicants
Your likely roleEmployer (deployer)
Key deadlineIn force
Penalty exposureIDHR enforcement under the IHRA — damages, civil penalties and fees
ARTEFACTS

The files this framework actually requires.

HB 3773 turns into a small, concrete artefact set. Hael generates each from the system's live configuration.

Files · Evidence pack
PDFDisparate-Impact Test Recordv3updated 2 min agoApproved
PDFEmployee/Applicant AI-Use Noticev2updated 14 MayApproved
PDFZip-Code Proxy Block Recordv2updated 11 MayApproved
PDFIDHR Subpart J Recordkeeping Filev1updated 04 MayDraft

GRC tools tell you these are missing. Hael generates them — from each system's real configuration.

THE DIFFERENCE

A checklist tells you what's missing. Hael puts it on record.

A checklist confirms the policy. Hael runs the disparate-impact testing, blocks the zip-code feature and seals the notice trail — strict liability is met by outcomes, not intent.

Typical GRC tool
Disparate-Impact Test Recordupload required
Employee/Applicant AI-Use Noticeupload required
Zip-Code Proxy Block Recordupload required
IDHR Subpart J Recordkeeping Fileupload required

Tracks the gap. You still author every document.

Hael
Disparate-Impact Test Recordv3Generated 2 min agoview
Employee/Applicant AI-Use Noticev2Generated · Approvedview
Zip-Code Proxy Block Recordv2Generated · Approvedview
IDHR Subpart J Recordkeeping Filev1Generated · Draftview

Generated from each system's real configuration, versioned, and kept current as it changes.

HOW HAEL WORKS

Discover, classify, produce — for Illinois HB 3773.

01DISCOVER

Find the systems in Illinois HB 3773 scope, including embedded third-party AI.

Inventory · 14 systems
Credit scoring enginehigh
HR screening bothigh
Salesforce Einsteinlimited
02CLASSIFY

Assess each against Illinois HB 3773's risk tiers and obligations.

Risk tier
Prohib.HighLimitedMin.
Role: ProviderArt. 9 · 11 · 14
03PRODUCE

Generate the Illinois HB 3773 records, versioned and current.

Generated files
Annex IV v4Approved
FRIA v2Approved
Monitoring v1Draft
COVERAGE

Every obligation, mapped to the control that satisfies it.

Rows are the framework's clauses.

Columns are the controls and files that satisfy them.

Cells update as the underlying configuration changes.

Coverage Map
Obligation → Control
5 obligations · 4 controls
88%
covered
Disp.-Impact
Notice
Proxy Block
Records
No discriminatory-effect AI
Full employment lifecycle
Worker/applicant notice
No zip-code proxies
IDHR recordkeeping
No discriminatory-effect AI
Disp.-Impact
v3 · sealed
MAPPING

Clause by clause.

Obligation
What it requires
Hael control / file
Status
No discriminatory-effect AIContinuous disparate-impact testing against IHRA classesDisparate-Impact Test RecordApproved
Employee / applicant noticePre-decision AI-use noticeEmployee/Applicant AI-Use NoticeApproved
No zip-code proxies for protected classesFeature-governance block on zip-code useZip-Code Proxy Block RecordApproved
IDHR Subpart J recordkeepingSealed audit-trail file aligned to draft Subpart JIDHR Subpart J Recordkeeping FileDraft
REUSE

Author once. Satisfy many.

The disparate-impact test record and notice lifecycle overlap directly with NYC Local Law 144's bias-audit and candidate-notice obligations and with the Colorado AI Act's consequential-decision duties — one evidence base covers an Illinois, New York City and Colorado employment footprint.

→ shared evidenceNYC LL 144Colorado AI ActEU AI Act
Trust & Security
SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001EU & US data residencySSO / SCIMEncryption in transit & at restAudit logging

Strict liability — answered with evidence, not intent.

HB 3773 is in force. Hael runs the disparate-impact testing and notice lifecycle continuously and produces the IDHR recordkeeping file from the same evidence base.