Govern AI to Texas TRAIGA, documented and current.
For each AI system used with Texas consumers, Hael holds the prohibited-use screen, the consumer disclosure, the impact records and the evidence a state regulator will ask for.
What TRAIGA demands of AI used in Texas.
The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act sets duties on developers and deployers of AI systems used with Texas consumers. It prohibits specific uses outright, requires consumer-facing disclosure where AI is used, and asks for documented reasonable care.
The Act creates an AI Council and a regulatory sandbox path for novel systems. Where harm occurs, the deployer is expected to be able to show the care exercised before harm — not after.
Three things Hael does for TRAIGA.
The same record. Texas alongside everywhere else.
A system entered once is governed under TRAIGA and against the EU AI Act, the Colorado AI Act, the GDPR and the NIST AI RMF — one record, one set of controls, one body of evidence.
The consumer disclosure record, generated and sourced.
The disclosure cites the system, the surface where the disclosure renders, the language used and the date it last changed. Where a surface is not yet wired, the section is held open.
Govern this alongside everything else.
One system, one record, governed against every framework at the same time. Map an obligation once; satisfy it everywhere it recurs.
See where you stand on Texas TRAIGA, free.
Answer a few questions and get an indicative view of what Texas TRAIGA expects of your AI systems and where you stand today — no sign-up to see your result.