Govern AI to China's AI regime, documented and current.
Generative-AI training-data lawfulness, CAC algorithm filings, deep-synthesis labelling and the 2025 mandatory labelling measures — sourced from the record, in the shape CAC opens.
What the regime demands.
China does not run a risk-tier regime. It runs a filing, labelling and security-assessment regime, administered by the Cyberspace Administration of China.
Three regulations stack on top of the PIPL, Data Security Law and Cybersecurity Law; compliance is the evidence CAC actually opens.
Three things Hael does for the China regime.
The same record. China alongside everywhere else.
The substantive training-data, labelling and security-assessment evidence is the same evidence the EU AI Act Annex IV file, the Korea AI Basic Act technical documentation and a GDPR DPIA reuse — rendered to CAC's format instead of Brussels'.
The CAC algorithm filing pack, sourced.
Filings cite the model record, training-data lawfulness evidence and security-assessment outcome. The PIPL cross-border section is held open until the transfer mechanism is approved.
Govern this alongside everything else.
One system, one record, governed against every framework at the same time. Map an obligation once; satisfy it everywhere it recurs.
See where you stand on China AI regime, free.
Answer a few questions and get an indicative view of what China AI regime expects of your AI systems and where you stand today — no sign-up to see your result.