Govern AI to the Korea AI Basic Act, documented and current.
High-impact AI risk plan, technical documentation, user pre-use notice, generative-AI labelling and (for foreign operators) the domestic-representative record — sourced from the record.
What the Act demands.
Korea's first horizontal AI law layers duties on operators of high-impact AI — healthcare, finance, public services, criminal justice and other rights-sensitive domains.
Generative AI carries its own labelling and pre-use notice duties; foreign operators above thresholds must appoint a Korean domestic representative.
Three things Hael does for the Korea Act.
The same record. Korea alongside everywhere else.
The high-impact risk plan and technical documentation overlap substantively with the EU AI Act Article 9 process and Annex IV file, and with a NIST AI RMF Profile — one set of substantive facts, MSIT's format.
The high-impact risk-management plan, sourced.
The plan cites the registry entry it governs, the controls it depends on and the evaluation evidence it consumes. The domestic-representative section is held open until appointment is recorded.
Govern this alongside everything else.
One system, one record, governed against every framework at the same time. Map an obligation once; satisfy it everywhere it recurs.
See where you stand on Korea AI Basic Act, free.
Answer a few questions and get an indicative view of what Korea AI Basic Act expects of your AI systems and where you stand today — no sign-up to see your result.