CERTIFICATION & FRAMEWORKS
Has your AI system been classified under the EU AI Act, and what obligations apply?
Current as of July 2026.
A model answer
Yes. [System] is classified as [risk tier] under Article 6 and Annex III, on the basis that [reasoning]. The obligations that follow are documented and evidenced: [e.g. Article 9 risk management, Article 10 data governance, Article 11 and Annex IV technical documentation, Article 13 transparency, Article 14 human oversight, Article 72 post-market monitoring]. Where we act as a deployer rather than a provider, the split of responsibilities is recorded. Current as of [date]; the timeline remains subject to the Digital Omnibus agreement, which is provisional pending formal adoption.
Evidence a buyer expects
The classification with its reasoning — a reviewer will probe the reasoning, not the label. For a high-risk system, the technical documentation should exist and be shareable under NDA.
Why weak answers fail
"We are EU AI Act compliant" is not a claim anyone can make for most systems — there is no certificate to hold. Sophisticated buyers know this. A bare tier label with no reasoning behind it invites exactly the follow-up you cannot answer.
What Hael produces
Hael's deterministic Article 6 / Annex III classification with cited reasoning, plus the Annex IV technical file, the Article 27 FRIA, the Article 9 risk assessment and the Article 14 human-oversight plan — generated from the system's real configuration and sealed.
Related questions
Current as of July 2026. General information, not legal advice.
Keep reading
More from the answer library.
CERTIFICATION & FRAMEWORKS
Are you certified to ISO/IEC 42001, or do you have a documented roadmap to certification?
Read answer →
OVERSIGHT & CONTROLSWhere does human oversight sit in your AI system, and who holds it?
Read answer →
SUPPLY CHAIN & INCIDENTSWhat happens when your AI system behaves incorrectly or causes harm?
Read answer →